Em busca do melhor sistema de proteção dos direitos humanos: devemos seguir o gato africano ou o leão interamericano?
DERECHOS RESERVADOS DE AUTOR
Todo documento incluido en la revista puede ser reproducido total o parcialmente, siempre y cuando se respete su contenido original, se cite la fuente y se use con fines académicos no comerciales. Misión Jurídica y su contenido se encuentra protegido bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivar 4.0 Internacional.
Misión Jurídica por Misión Jurídica se distribuye bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivar 4.0 Internacional.
Basada en una obra en http://unicolmayor.edu.co/publicaciones/index.php/mjuridica/index.
Permisos que vayan más allá de lo cubierto por esta licencia pueden encontrarse en http://unicolmayor.edu.co/publicaciones/index.php/mjuridica/index.
Mostrar biografia dos autores
Este artigo representa uma tentativa de comparar os principais ativos positivos e as grandes fragilidades dos sistemas interamericano e africano de direitos humanos, à luz da atividade da Comissão e da Corte em ambos os sistemas. A análise, centrada nos principais instrumentos de direitos humanos para as duas regiões, está dividida em duas seções, por sua vez estruturadas em múltiplos parágrafos. A primeira seção explora o mandato legal das agências em questão. A segunda seção examina como esses órgãos funcionam na prática, na forma de uma revisão de como eles usam seu mandato legal e que impacto é alcançado concretamente. Além disso, o artigo discutirá a influência fundamental de fatores históricos, sociais e outros contextuais, pedras angulares fundamentais de quaisquer considerações jurídicas consequentes nos sistemas de direitos humanos.
Visualizações de artigos 184 | Visitas em PDF 203
Downloads
African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, Social and Economic Rights Action Center (SERAC) and Center for Economic and Social Rights (CESR) v Nigeria, Communication No. 155/96, 27 May 2002.
African Commission on Human and People’s Rights v Republic of Kenya (Ogiek Decision), African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights (ACtHPR), Judgement, Application No. 006/2012, 26 May 2017.
Antkowiak, ‘Remedial Approaches to Human Rights Violations: The Inter-American Court of
Human Rights and Beyond’, 2008, 46 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law.
Bantekas and Oette, International Human Rights Law and Practice, Cambridge University Press, Second Edition, 2016.
Burgorgue-Larsen, ‘Decompartmentalization: the Key Technique for Interpreting Regional Human Rights Treaties’, 2018, 16 International Journal of Constitutional Law 1.
Canton, ‘To Strengthen Human Rights, Change the OAS (Not the Commission)’, 2013, 20 Human Rights Brief 2.
Contesse, ‘The Inter-American Court of Human Rights' Advisory Opinion on Gender Identity and Same-Sex Marriage’, 2018, 22 American Society of International Law – Insights 9.
Dulitzky, ‘An Alternative Approach to the Conventionality Control Doctrine’, 2015, 109 American Journal of International Law.
Engstrom, ‘Reconceptualising the Impact of the Inter-American Human Rights System’, 2017, 2 Revista Direito and Praxis 8.
Goldman, ‘History and Action: The Inter-American Human Rights System and the Role of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights’, 2009, 31 Human Rights Quarterly 4.
Gyan Nyarko, Oluborode Jegede, ‘Recent developments: Human rights developments in the African Union during 2016’, 2017, 17 African Human Rights Law Journal.
Heyns, Padilla, Zwaak, ‘A schematic comparison of Regional Human Rights Systems: an update’, 2006, 3 International Journal on Human Rights 4.
Huneeus, Rask Madsen, ‘Between universalism and regional law and politics: a comparative history of the American, European, and African human rights systems’, 2018, 16 International Journal of Constitutional Law 1.
Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR), Severe Financial Crisis of the IACHR Leads to Suspension of Hearings and Imminent Layoff of Nearly Half its Staff, Press Release, 23 May 2016.
IntLawGrrls, Ogiek: The African Court of Human and Peoples’ Rights first decision on indigenous rights, by D. Townsend, 28 May 2017.
Killander, Gyan Nyarko, ‘Recent developments: Human rights developments in the African Union (January 2017-September 2018)’, 2018, 18 African Human Rights Law Journal, p 742, 757.
Lixinski, ‘Treaty Interpretation by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights: Expansionism at the Service of the Unity of International Law’, 2010, 21 The European Journal of International Law 3.
Pinto, ‘The Role of the Inter-American Commission and Court of Human Rights in the Protection of Human Rights: Achievements and Contemporary Challenges’, 2013, 20 Human Rights Brief 2.
Saramaka People v Suriname, Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACtHR), Judgement (Merits, Reparations and Costs), Series C No. 172, 28 November 2007.
University of Pretoria, Centre for Human Rights (Faculty of Law), Centre for Human Rights Calls for Autonomy and Independence of the African Commission to Be Reaffirmed; and for Action on Cameroon and Eritrea, 28 April 2018.
Völkerrechtsblog, The Inter-American System has always been in crisis, and we always found a way out”: an interview with Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor Poisot, by L. Sanchez and R. Kunz, 17 October 2016.
Viljoen, ‘From a cat into a lion? An overview of the progress and challenges of the African human right system at the African Commission’s 25-year mark’, 2013, 17 Law, Democracy and Development.
Gyan Nyarko, Oluborode Jegede, ‘Recent developments: Human rights developments in the African Union during 2016’, 2017, 17 African Human Rights Law Journal, p 304, 308.