Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Analysis of the Equality and Non-Discrimination Principle in the Application of the Value Added Tax in Ecuador

Análisis sobre el principio de igualdad y no discriminación en la aplicación del Impuesto al Valor Agregado en el Ecuador




Section
Artículos originales internacionales

How to Cite
Cuyo, J., & Morales Navarrete, M. A. (2024). Analysis of the Equality and Non-Discrimination Principle in the Application of the Value Added Tax in Ecuador. Misión Jurídica, 17(27), 139-150. https://doi.org/10.25058/1794600X.2463

Dimensions
PlumX
license
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

COPYRIGHT PROVISIONS

Every papper included in the magazine can be reproduced whole or in part, provided that respect for its original content, the source is acknowledged and is used with non-commercial academic. Legal mission and its content is protected under a license Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-SinDerivar 4.0 international.

Licencia Creative Commons
Misión Jurídica is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivar 4.0 International License.
Based on a work in http://unicolmayor.edu.co/publicaciones/index.php/mjuridica/index.
Permits that go beyond what is covered by this license can be found at http://unicolmayor.edu.co/publicaciones/index.php/mjuridica/index.


Jomayra Cuyo,

Facultad de jurisprudencia y ciencias políticas de la Universidad Indoamérica 


Martha Alejandra Morales Navarrete,

Magister en Administración Tributaria y en Derecho Penal y Criminología con experiencia en derecho económico en el ámbito tributario, ex procuradora del Servicio de Rentas Internas, ex Secretaria Relatora y Coordinadora Interinstitucional de la Corte Nacional de Justicia Sala Especializada de lo Contencioso Tributario, ex Jefe de Rentas y Procuradora Síndica del GAD Municipalidad de Ambato, Docente de la Universidad Tecnológica Indoamérica. 


 This article aims to evaluate the value added tax application in Ecuador, which goes against guaranteeing the equality, non-discrimination, and pro-tributario principles, since it identified disproportionate socioeconomic impacts arising between different groups of Ecuadorian society. The value added tax (VAT) in Ecuador, an essential tool for tax revenue, has sparked heated debate because of its potential impact on equity and non-discrimination. This research article explores how VAT affects different social groups, highlighting that the most vulnerable sectors bear a relatively greater tax burden, contravening the constitutional principles of equality and non-discrimination. The analysis reveals that, while VAT effectively raises revenue, its design and application need adjustments to protect low-income populations. The solutions proposed include commodity exemptions and tax equalization mechanisms. In addition, the need for transparency and citizen participation in tax policy development is emphasized, as well as the promotion of tax education to foster clear understanding of the tax system, ensuring that the tax burden is distributed more equitably and fairly. 


Article visits 20 | PDF visits 7


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Almeida Castro, M. O. (2019). El principio de igualdad en el derecho tributario ecuatoriano. Ediciones Jurídicas Cuyo.
  2. Atkinson, A. B. (2015). Inequality: What can be done? Harvard University Press.
  3. Bird, R. M., & Gendron, P. P. (2007). The VAT in developing and transitional countries. Cambridge University Press.
  4. Ebrill, L., Keen, M., Bodin, J. P., & Summers, V. (2001). The modern VAT. International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781589060265.071
  5. Gutiérrez, R. R. (2018). Manual de derecho tributario. Corporación de Estudios y Publicaciones.
  6. Musgrave, R. A., & Musgrave, P. B. (1989). Public finance in theory and practice. McGraw-Hill.
  7. OECD. (2016). Consumption tax trends 2016: VAT/GST and excise rates, trends and policy issues. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/ctt-2016-en
  8. Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Harvard University Press.
  9. Slemrod, J., & Bakija, J. (2017). Taxing ourselves: A citizen's guide to the debate over taxes. MIT Press.
  10. Serrano, J. C. (2020). Derecho tributario ecuatoriano: Análisis crítico. Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar.
  11. Asamblea Nacional del Ecuador. (2008). Constitución de la República del Ecuador. https://www.asambleanacional.gob.ec/es/constitucion-de-la-republica-del-ecuador
  12. Gobierno de Suecia. (2020). Swedish tax system. https://www.government.se/49b742/contentassets/f0da50b95f524fc5a3b9f4f7b0b69c59/swedish-tax-system.pdf
  13. Internal Revenue Service (IRS). (n.d.). U.S. tax code. https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p17.pdf
  14. Ministerio de Economía y Finanzas de Ecuador. (2021). Informe económico y financiero.
  15. New Zealand Inland Revenue. (2020). Tax simplification in New Zealand. https://www.ird.govt.nz
  16. Servicio de Rentas Internas (SRI). (n.d.). Impuesto al valor agregado (IVA). https://www.sri.gob.ec/iva
Sistema OJS 3.4.0.5 - Metabiblioteca |