Enforcing Foreign Judgments – Principle Points from The Viewpoint of the Execution of the Right
Ejecución de sentencias extranjeras – aspectos principales desde el punto de vista de la aplicación de los derechos
COPYRIGHT PROVISIONS
Every papper included in the magazine can be reproduced whole or in part, provided that respect for its original content, the source is acknowledged and is used with non-commercial academic. Legal mission and its content is protected under a license Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-
Misión Jurídica is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivar 4.0 International License.
Based on a work in http://unicolmayor.edu.co/publicaciones/index.php/mjuridica/index.
Permits that go beyond what is covered by this license can be found at http://unicolmayor.edu.co/publicaciones/index.php/mjuridica/index.
Show authors biography
The aim of the paper is to address the nature and the importance of the activity resulting in the issuance of the formula of the coercive execution based on recognized foreign judgments. The function of the formula is to prevent infringement of parties’ rights and obligations in the course of the execution process due to misunderstandings of the ruling in the foreign judgment by the enforcement authorities, etc. In virtue of this specifics, it is considered that the judge, granting recognition and adapting the formula of the resolution of the material dispute to the national legal system, is the most appropriate authority to order also the formula of the execution together with the recognition. Based on these considerations, conclusions are drawn about the types of litigation for recognition and enforcement, the legal construction of the recognition, the legal effects, the application of the new European Union regulation.
Article visits 129 | PDF visits 99
Downloads
- Law on Civil Procedure Rules. Published in the State Gazette # 31 of 8th of February 1892 (abolished).
- Law on Civil Procedure Rules. Published in the State Gazette # 246 of 1th of February 1930 (abolished).
- Code of Civil Procedure. Published in the State Gazette # 59 of 8th of February 1952 (abolished).
- Code of Civil Procedure. Published in the State Gazette # 59 of 20th of July 2007, in force from the 1st of May 2008.
- Code on International Private Law. Published in the State Gazette # 42 of 17th of May 2005, in force from the 21st of May 2008.
- Regulation (EU) 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Counsel on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=celex%3A32012R1215.
- Projects for a convention and the reports of the Working Group on the Judgments Project (The Hague Conference on Private International Law). Retrieved from: http://conflictoflaws.net/News/2015/03/Proyecto-mundial-La-Haya.pdf.
- The ‘Heidelberg’ Report (StudyJLS/C4/2005/03), http://ec.europa.eu/civiljustice/news/docs/study_application_brussels_1_en.pdf.
- Barnett, P. Resjudicata, Estoppel, andForeignJudgments. United Kingdom, OxfordUniversityPress, Oxford, 2001.
- Bonchovski. P. The Subject of the Procedure for Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgment, Правна Мисъл, Bulgaria, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, 2005, No 3. 34-45.
- Bonchovski, P. The Legal Effects of the Decision of Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in the Light of the Requirements of the Protection of the National Sovereignty. Bulgaria, Юридически свят, Sofia, CIBI, 2008, book 1.
- Bonchovski, P.Free Circulation of Judgments (The Republic of Bulgaria and the European Union). Bulgaria,Institute of Legal Studies-Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, 2016.
- Bower, S, Turner, A. & Handley, K. The Doctrine of Res Judicata.United Kingdom, Butterwords & Co (Publishers), 3rd Ed., London-Edinburgh-Dublin, 1996.
- Cappelletti, M., Perillo, J.CivilProcedureinItaly. Netherlands, MartinsNijnoff, TheHague, 1965.
- Chernev, S. (1999, № 6).ThepowerofcoerciveexecutionaftertheamendmentsinCPC (StateGazette # 64, 1999).Търговско право, Bulgaria, Sofia, 20-30.
- Geimer, R.Internationales Zivilprozeßrecht. Germany, Verlag Dr. Otto Schmidt, 4., neubearbeitete u. erweiterte Auflage, Köln, 2001.
- Jauering, O. Zwangsvollstreckungs- und Konkursrecht. Germany, Verlag C. H. Beck, 20. völlig neubearbeitete Auflage des Friedrich Lent begründeten Werkes, München, 1996.
- Linke, H.InternationalesZivilprozeßrecht, LeitfragenfürVerfahrenmitAuslandsbezug. Germany, VerlagDr. OttoSchmidt, 3. völlig überarbeiteteAuflage, Köln, 2001.
- Matscher, F.
- DieAnerkennungundVollstreckunggerichtlicherEntscheidungenimVerhältniszwischen ÖsterreichundGroßbritannien. Austria, JuristischeBlätter, Wien. 1963 Heft 9/10 und 21/12.
- Nagel, H. und Gottwald, P.Internationales Zivilprozeßrecht. Germany, Aschendorff Rechtsverlag, 5., neubearbeitete Auflage, Münster, 2002.
- Richmann, W. M. and Reynolds W. L.Understanding Conflict of Laws. USA, Matthew Bender & Co., INC, 2nd ed., New York, 1993.
- Rosenberg, L. undSchwab, K.Zivilprozeßrecht.Germany, C. H. Beck Verlag, 11. Auflage, München, 1974.
- Schack, H.Internationales Zivilverfahrensrecht.Germany, Verlag C. H. Beck, 3, neubearbeitete u. erweiterte Auflage, München, 2002.
- Schütze, R.Die Anerkennung und Vollstreckung ausländischer Zivilurteile in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland als verfahrensrechtliches Problem. Germany, Doktorarbeit, unveröffentlicht, 1960.
- Sier, K.Das Internationale Privatrecht der Schweiz. Switzerland, Schulthess Juristische Medien AG, Zürich-Basel-Genf, 2002.
- Walter, G. Vollstreckungsrecht. Walter de Gruyter & Co, 2. Auflage, Berlin, 1974.
- Zöller, R./Bearbeiter.Zivilprozeßordnung. Germany, Verlag Dr. Otto Schmidt, 21. Auflage, Köln, 1999.