Analysis of the expression “Reasonable Grounds” in the context of, Arrest and Search and Seizure warrants
Análisis de la expresión motivos razonablemente fundados en el ámbito de la captura y ordenes de allanamiento y registro
COPYRIGHT PROVISIONS
Every papper included in the magazine can be reproduced whole or in part, provided that respect for its original content, the source is acknowledged and is used with non-commercial academic. Legal mission and its content is protected under a license Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-
Misión Jurídica is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivar 4.0 International License.
Based on a work in http://unicolmayor.edu.co/publicaciones/index.php/mjuridica/index.
Permits that go beyond what is covered by this license can be found at http://unicolmayor.edu.co/publicaciones/index.php/mjuridica/index.
Show authors biography
This article analyzes the expression reasons reasonably founded in the area of the arrest warrant and the searches and searches. To this end, it carries out a search for criteria that inform this question, both in national legislation and jurisprudence and in external regulations. Thus, this work strives to find decision rules that support the meaning of the expression in question. For this reason, it questions the subjectivity that may arise when the judge is responsible for issuing the corresponding order, without the in-depth analysis and justification required to uphold a judicial resolution based on reasonably well-founded reasons. Finally, it questions the influence of beliefs and points to doubt and objective knowledge as the basis for understanding the rationality of this expression.
Article visits 290 | PDF visits 3150
Downloads
Alexy, R.(1998). Derecho y razón práctica. México: Ediciones Fontamara. Borrero, R, & Sampedro A. (2010). Sistema acusatorio y jurisprudencia. Bogotá: Editorial Ibáñez. Ferrer, B. (2007).La valoración racional de la prueba. Madrid: Editorial Marcial Pons.
Feteris, E. (2007). Fundamentos de la Argumentación Jurídica. Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia.
Herzer, R. & Naucke, W. (2008). Filosofía del derecho. Buenos Aires: Editorial Astrea.
Ley 906 de 2004. Bogotá: Senado de la Republica de Colombia. Disponible en http://www.suin-juriscol.gov.co/viewDocument.asp?ruta=Leyes/1670249
Ley 1142de 2007. Bogotá: Congreso de la Republica de Colombia. Disponible en http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/ley_1142_2007.html
Mill, J. S. (2004). Sobre la libertad”. Madrid: Editorial Edaf. Popper, K. (2007). Conocimiento objetivo. Madrid: Editorial Tecnos.
Sentencia C - 185, de 2008. Bogotá: Corte Constitucional de la Republica de Colombia, Disponible en https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma.php?i=36629Sentencia C-366, de 2014. Bogotá: Congreso de la Republica de Colombia, MP. Nilson Pinilla Pinilla. Disponible en http://www.suin-juriscol.gov.co/viewDocument.asp?id=20023002
Sentencia C - 673, de 2005. Bogotá: Corte Constitucional de la Republica de Colombia. Disponible en http://legal.legis.com.co/document/Index?obra=jurcol&document=jurcol_759920420d3bf034e0430a010151f034Sentencia C – 226, de 2008. Bogotá: Corte Constitucional de la Republica de Colombia. Disponible en http://legal.legis.com.co/document/Index?obra=jurcol&document=jurcol_759920424a52f034e0430a010151f034
Zuluaga, T. ,J. “De los motivos fundados para la afectación de derechos fundamentales en el proceso penal colombiano”. Revista Nuevo Foro Penal, 10 (83), (julio-diciembre, 2014), pp.: 167-209.